Issues about how to better our bridge at the top V

February 19, 2011 at 8:22 am Leave a comment

The point of yesterday’s story about Vietnam is that chess is considered to be important and not trivial. The point is that the Vietnamese don’t do it for bridge and, I imagine, wouldn’t in a pink fit. And the point is that it is considered a vital investment because the rest of the world thinks chess is important too.

This is a NEWS report recently posted on the internet late last month:

Vietnamese chess players falter at home Vietnam Daily News

The Vietnamese squad failed expectations at the recently concluded international chess tournament – HDBank Open Cup – with the top and second seeded players ending up in fourth and fifth positions.

Le Quang Liem, ranked 79th in the world (Elo 2664), was top seed at the January 4-9 competition held at Ho Chi Minh City’s Rex Hotel.

“With the highest Elo and as the top seed, I was under pressure in games against strong contestants from China and the Philippines.

“As a result, I started all the games with an idea of having to be the winner, so sometimes I was stressed and made some wrong moves, especially in the decisive game against Filipino Gomez John Paul, which made it impossible for me to fight for the championship.”

Some observers said that Liem’s approach of playing to win, and taking risks to do it, has both helped and harmed him.

It was this approach, they say, that stripped Liem of his chance of winning the gold medal at the Asian Games in China last November, having to settle for silver.


With seven points after nine games, China’s Yu Yangyi won the men’s title at the HDBank Open Cup which concluded at Ho Chi Minh City’s Rex Hotel on January 9. Yu’s compatriot Wen Yang finished second. Wen also had seven points so they were each awarded a US$5,000 cash prize. In the women’s event, Vietnamese player Nguyen Thi Mai Hung finished on top but four other players also had the same 4.5 points, so they were each given $600 in cash prizes.

The situation was repeated at the HDBank Open Cup, they say.

Liem said, “It may be my way. In any game against a stronger or weaker player, I always set the goal of winning the game.

“It doesn’t mean I don’t respect them. It is a matter of spirit. If you don’t set the goal of winning a game, you are the loser before the game starts.”

Coach Lam Minh Chau had this to say: “It is the same in every contest. The top seed is always under pressure to win all the games.

“Some people say Liem always wants to win. I think it has its own advantages and disadvantages.”

Chau said a good player must have a special, even unusual, character. This is why Liem and Vietnam’s second best player, Nguyen Ngoc Truong Son, have several times recorded great wins against much stronger players.

He added however, that both Liem and Son need to change some of their ways, and aim at occasional draws in key games to be in a good position.

“I think Liem and Son will make their own changes in international competitions in the near future,” Chau said.
Reported by Hoang Quynh

end of report.

There has been some discussion on this blog recently suggesting that bridge was popular in the 1930s because it was sold as something trivial, but nothing could be further from the truth. In fact newspapers of the day in Australia – and I’m only guessing elsewhere, since bridge wasn’t especially popular here – had these sorts of reports on bridge in that period.

It is obvious that bridge has all sorts of drawbacks. It is associated with gambling; it has a most unfortunate choice of name – ‘bridge’ – as Peter Gill pointed out recently in comments; it has a shorter history. But if you look at why bridge is not respected it isn’t for these reasons. After all, the average person who thinks ‘Wow, that is SO amazing, you play chess, you must be SO clever’ also thinks ‘Yeah, bridge champion…my grandmother’s one of those. And my aunt. And my….’ That is NOT because they are all boned up on the history of chess and bridge. They wouldn’t actually have a clue if bridge has been around since Greco-Roman wrestling or since last year. The reasons why they think the negative way they do about bridge and the positive way they do about chess is because bridge markets itself by dumbing itself down in every way possible, while chess does the opposite.

People are drawn to play chess because it is hard. They are invited to play bridge because it is easy.


Entry filed under: thoughts on bridge.

Issues about how to better our bridge at the top IV Issues about how to better our bridge at the top VI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

February 2011
« Jan   Mar »

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

%d bloggers like this: